15 Nisan 2011 Cuma
philosophical post
We are all agree with the phenomenon Jane Rickson's thought that everyone has a right to a private life because of civil liberties. Unless their behaviors threaten to society's security. It is easy to adapt public's interest to celebrities personal life. This sophisticated decreases the value of public's quality.
Share this post!
Kaydol:
Kayıt Yorumları (Atom)
4 baby:
I agree with you .Sometimes we need to protect our privacy but when we do that we need to consider our security.That's why this issue is sophisticated as you said.
I respect your opinion but I don't think the same with you. I think if the person want to be a famous, they must know publics want to learn sth about them, yes you could be right it may affect publics especially some teenagers negatively but usually they do some stupid thing to be known, to be more famous. Celebrities should know they are under surveillance and if they care of their privacy life, they should be careful I think. this is only their problem :)
This is a very complicated few sentences. I think that you tried to get all the words into the text in as few sentences as possible. I am not sure without some of your own ideas in the middle of them what they mean but I can see clear evidence of accuracy in the grammar as you have for the most part used all the words in the correct form. I would rather use the blogs to comment on ideas rather than grammar however. Also Zeynep, you have got to get some music onto your site. It is much more entertaining for me and I am learning things all the time. Busra put some music from Erkan Ogur and Yavuz Cetin called Dunya. Do you know about it? It is very relaxing. And come to school tomorrow
Yorum Gönder